ASC2020 - 16-19 Feb, Melbourne

  • Home
  • Schedule
    • Speakers
    • Session Summary
  • Registration
    • Conference Volunteering
  • Call for Papers and Sessions
    • Important Dates
    • Call for Session Producers
    • Research Stream Call for Papers
  • Sponsors
    • Sponsorship
  • Information
    • Location
    • Code of Conduct
    • Mobility

January 22, 2020 by Lisa Bailey

Broadcasting for Impact

Stephen introduced impact campaigns to the ABC, with notable success, including on two series of War on Waste, with 68% of the huge audience declaring to have changed behaviour after watching the show. In this session Stephen will discuss producing broadcast content that has far reaching impacts from attitudes to recycling, to senate inquiries on seafood labelling, and how lessons learned are being translated to current ABC projects on climate change including The Fight for Planet A: The Climate Challenge documentary.

 

Presenter

Stephen Oliver, Manager Documentaries, ABC

 

When: Tuesday 18th February, 12.20pm
Where: Room G31, Learning and Teaching Building, 19 Ancora Imparo Way, Clayton
Hashtag: TBC

 

Filed Under: 30 minutes, Advanced, Beginner, Day 3, Intermediate, Priorities, Publics Tagged With: climate change, evaluation, impact, Rejection of science, science communication, science journalism

September 1, 2018 by asc2018

Comparing science communication models with a long-term participatory case study: The Climate Champion Program

When: Tuesday 13th November, 2:00pm – 3:30pm
Where: Theatre, Level 2 down the stairs to the right of the registration/foyer area
Hashtag: #T8

Over the last 20 years, scholars and policymakers have called for science communication to move beyond linear engagement to participatory engagement, especially with publically contested science. However, there has been little scholarly reflection on long-term participatory science communication practice. My study compared the theorised science communication models with a seven-year case study: the Australian Climate Champion Program, where scientists and farmers jointly addressed the problem of climate risk. I investigated scientists and farmers’ objectives for participating, the nature of their interactions, and the relationships between them. I analysed how they valued different sources of knowledge and acknowledged risk. Respectful, open and trusting relationships developed between most of the farmers and scientists participating in the program resulting in upstream engagement and co-learning. This case study demonstrates that a long-term participatory program can enhance co-existing linear forms of communication (deficit and dialogue) to help achieve participatory outcomes.

Session

Evidence-based scicom: Research exploring knowledge, beliefs and perceptions

Presenter

Jennifer Metcalfe, Director, Econnect Communication

 

Filed Under: 90 minutes, Day 3, Novel Topic - suits all levels, Research Tagged With: climate change, participation, science communication models, science engagement

Australian Science Communicators

About ASC.

@auscicomm

ASC on Facebook

Questions? Please contact Kali on asc2020@asc.asn.au.

Acknowledgements

© 2020 Australian Science Communicators

Editor Login.

MAJOR SPONSOR

Monash Sustainability Development Institute

MEDIA SPONSORS

SUPPORTED BY

NETWORKING EVENTS SPONSORS

Copyright © 2025 · Executive Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in